Talk:Do-ocracy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(I don't get the use cases) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
And when I see "The Being Excellent To Each Other Version", I expect it to be contrasted with a "Not Excellent" version. But they both seem to embody the ideals of being excellent. [[User:Angineer|Andy Tracy]] ([[User talk:Angineer|talk]]) 17:40, 29 March 2020 (PDT) | And when I see "The Being Excellent To Each Other Version", I expect it to be contrasted with a "Not Excellent" version. But they both seem to embody the ideals of being excellent. [[User:Angineer|Andy Tracy]] ([[User talk:Angineer|talk]]) 17:40, 29 March 2020 (PDT) | ||
I edited it to make more sense. Now one version is excellent and one is not. | |||
[[User:Angineer|Andy Tracy]] ([[User talk:Angineer|talk]]) 12:26, 24 October 2020 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:26, 24 October 2020
Is anyone else confused by the use cases here? When I see "The Short Version", I expect a long version to follow. What follows is not a long version of the short version; it's actually a different scenario.
And when I see "The Being Excellent To Each Other Version", I expect it to be contrasted with a "Not Excellent" version. But they both seem to embody the ideals of being excellent. Andy Tracy (talk) 17:40, 29 March 2020 (PDT)
I edited it to make more sense. Now one version is excellent and one is not. Andy Tracy (talk) 12:26, 24 October 2020 (PDT)